AMD Radeon HD 7480D vs Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7480D and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7480D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 8x more pipelines: 128 vs 16
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 694 vs 538
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 September 2012 vs 14 May 2012 |
Pipelines | 128 vs 16 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 694 vs 538 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 614 MHz
- Around 45% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 724 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 754 vs 348
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 vs 348
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 119
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 347 vs 281
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 vs 1235
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 1235
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1704
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1704
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 614 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 724 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 754 vs 348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 vs 348 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 vs 119 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 vs 281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1492 vs 1235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 vs 1235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 vs 1704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 vs 1704 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7480D
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7480D | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 694 | 538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 348 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 348 | 754 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 | 194 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 281 | 347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1235 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1235 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1704 | 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1704 | 2392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.36 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.009 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7480D | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Terascale 3 | Generation 7.0 |
Code name | Trinity | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Launch date | 26 September 2012 | 14 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1499 | 1500 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 724 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Core clock speed | 614 MHz | 650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 16 |
Floating-point performance | 33.6 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 4.2 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,200 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.0 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |