AMD Radeon HD 7480D vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7480D and NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7480D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 724 MHz vs 715 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 128 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
| Launch date | 26 September 2012 vs 23 August 2012 |
| Boost clock speed | 724 MHz vs 715 MHz |
| Pipelines | 128 vs 96 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2141 vs 694
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1032 vs 348
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1032 vs 348
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 126 vs 119
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 432 vs 281
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1595 vs 1235
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1595 vs 1235
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1704
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1704
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2141 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1032 vs 348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1032 vs 348 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 126 vs 119 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 432 vs 281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1595 vs 1235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1595 vs 1235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 vs 1704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 vs 1704 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7480D
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 7480D | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 694 | 2141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 348 | 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 348 | 1032 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 | 126 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 281 | 432 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1235 | 1595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1235 | 1595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1704 | 2392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1704 | 2392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.233 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.144 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.519 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.151 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.605 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 7480D | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Terascale 3 | Fermi |
| Code name | Trinity | GF108 |
| Launch date | 26 September 2012 | 23 August 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1499 | 1500 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 724 MHz | 715 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 614 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 128 | 96 |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 585 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||

