AMD Radeon HD 7480D vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7480D and NVIDIA Quadro 3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7480D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 614 MHz vs 450 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 348 vs 218
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 348 vs 218
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1235 vs 374
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1235 vs 374
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1704 vs 543
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1704 vs 543
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 September 2012 vs 22 February 2011 |
Core clock speed | 614 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 348 vs 218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 348 vs 218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1235 vs 374 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1235 vs 374 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1704 vs 543 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1704 vs 543 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 240 vs 128
- 5.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3764 vs 683
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 312 vs 119
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 279
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 240 vs 128 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3764 vs 683 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 vs 119 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 vs 279 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7480D
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7480D | NVIDIA Quadro 3000M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 683 | 3764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 348 | 218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 348 | 218 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 | 312 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 279 | 995 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1235 | 374 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1235 | 374 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1704 | 543 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1704 | 543 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.95 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 325.007 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.865 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.961 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7480D | NVIDIA Quadro 3000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Terascale 3 | Fermi |
Code name | Trinity | GF104 |
Launch date | 26 September 2012 | 22 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1496 | 1499 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $398.96 | |
Price now | $199.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.98 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 724 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 614 MHz | 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 240 |
Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 18 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Laptop size | large |