AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP and NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • 3x more texture fill rate: 9.12 GTexel / s vs 3.0 billion / sec
  • 4x more pipelines: 192 vs 48
  • 3x better floating-point performance: 291.8 gflops vs 96 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 332 vs 286
  • Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1071 vs 751
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2177 vs 1570
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2177 vs 1570
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 October 2012 vs 3 September 2010
Texture fill rate 9.12 GTexel / s vs 3.0 billion / sec
Pipelines 192 vs 48
Floating-point performance 291.8 gflops vs 96 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 332 vs 286
Geekbench - OpenCL 1071 vs 751
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2177 vs 1570
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2177 vs 1570

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M

  • Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 760 MHz
  • 5.4x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 221 vs 129
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 760 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 12 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 221 vs 129
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1158 vs 1153
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1158 vs 1153

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
332
286
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
129
221
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1071
751
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1153
1158
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1153
1158
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2177
1570
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2177
1570
Name AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
PassMark - G3D Mark 332 286
PassMark - G2D Mark 129 221
Geekbench - OpenCL 1071 751
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1153 1158
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1153 1158
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2177 1570
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2177 1570
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 442
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 442

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 3 Fermi
Code name Scrapper GF108
Launch date 2 October 2012 3 September 2010
Launch price (MSRP) $67
Place in performance rating 1385 1388
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 760 MHz 1000 MHz
Floating-point performance 291.8 gflops 96 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 192 48
Texture fill rate 9.12 GTexel / s 3.0 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 12 Watt
Transistor count 1,303 million 585 million
CUDA cores 48

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.4 4.6

Memory

Memory type System Shared (G)DDR3
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 800 MHz
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus