AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP vs AMD FirePro M8900
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP and AMD FirePro M8900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 760 MHz vs 680 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
| Launch date | 2 October 2012 vs 12 April 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 760 MHz vs 680 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M8900
- 3.6x more texture fill rate: 32.6 GTexel / s vs 9.12 GTexel / s
- 5x more pipelines: 960 vs 192
- 4.5x better floating-point performance: 1,305.6 gflops vs 291.8 gflops
- 17.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18738 vs 1061
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 32.6 GTexel / s vs 9.12 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 960 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,305.6 gflops vs 291.8 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18738 vs 1061 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M8900
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP | AMD FirePro M8900 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 333 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 129 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1061 | 18738 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1153 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1153 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2177 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2177 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.529 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 760.858 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.158 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.149 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 108.525 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP | AMD FirePro M8900 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Scrapper | Blackcomb |
| Launch date | 2 October 2012 | 12 April 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $67 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1389 | 1392 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 760 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 291.8 gflops | 1,305.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 960 |
| Texture fill rate | 9.12 GTexel / s | 32.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,303 million | 1,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Bus support | n / a | |
| Form factor | MXM-B | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 115 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |

