AMD Radeon HD 7650A vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7650A and NVIDIA Quadro 1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

AMD Radeon HD 7650A

NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7650A

Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
5x more pipelines: 480 vs 96
2.1x better floating-point performance: 576.0 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 45 Watt
Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 287 vs 195
4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9507 vs 2123
Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 259.825 vs 207.789
Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.298 vs 10.149
2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.841 vs 23.677

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 January 2012 vs 13 January 2011
Texture fill rate	14.4 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	480 vs 96
Floating-point performance	576.0 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	33 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	569 vs 567
PassMark - G2D Mark	287 vs 195
Geekbench - OpenCL	9507 vs 2123
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	259.825 vs 207.789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	13.298 vs 10.149
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	53.841 vs 23.677

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

Around 17% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 600 MHz
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.218 vs 4.429
Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.52 vs 0.435
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1633 vs 621
3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2327 vs 700
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1633 vs 621
3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2327 vs 700

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	700 MHz vs 600 MHz
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	5.218 vs 4.429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.52 vs 0.435
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1633 vs 621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2327 vs 700
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1633 vs 621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2327 vs 700

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7650A
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

569

567

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

287

195

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

9507

2123

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.429

5.218

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

259.825

207.789

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.435

0.52

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13.298

10.149

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

53.841

23.677

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

621

1633

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

700

2327

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

621

1633

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

700

2327

Name	AMD Radeon HD 7650A	NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	569	567
PassMark - G2D Mark	287	195
Geekbench - OpenCL	9507	2123
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.429	5.218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	259.825	207.789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.435	0.52
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	13.298	10.149
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	53.841	23.677
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	621	1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	700	2327
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	621	1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	700	2327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		894
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		894

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon HD 7650A	NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Essentials
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Fermi
Code name	Onega	GF108
Launch date	5 January 2012	13 January 2011
Launch price (MSRP)	$262	$174.95
Place in performance rating	1447	1448
Price now	$262	$99.95
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100)	3.94	8.91
Technical info
Core clock speed	600 MHz	700 MHz
Floating-point performance	576.0 gflops	268.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	480	96
Texture fill rate	14.4 GTexel / s	11.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	33 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	716 million	585 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB / s	28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Shared memory		0