AMD Radeon HD 7650A vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7650A and NVIDIA Quadro 1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7650A

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
  • Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
  • 5x more pipelines: 480 vs 96
  • 2.1x better floating-point performance: 576.0 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
  • Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 287 vs 195
  • 4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9507 vs 2113
  • Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 259.825 vs 207.789
  • Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.298 vs 10.149
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.841 vs 23.677
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 January 2012 vs 13 January 2011
Texture fill rate 14.4 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 480 vs 96
Floating-point performance 576.0 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 569 vs 567
PassMark - G2D Mark 287 vs 195
Geekbench - OpenCL 9507 vs 2113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 259.825 vs 207.789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.298 vs 10.149
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 53.841 vs 23.677

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

  • Around 17% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.218 vs 4.429
  • Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.52 vs 0.435
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1633 vs 621
  • 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2327 vs 700
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1633 vs 621
  • 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2327 vs 700
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 700 MHz vs 600 MHz
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.218 vs 4.429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.52 vs 0.435
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1633 vs 621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2327 vs 700
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1633 vs 621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2327 vs 700

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7650A
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
569
567
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
287
195
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
9507
2113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4.429
5.218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
259.825
207.789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.435
0.52
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13.298
10.149
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
53.841
23.677
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
621
1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
700
2327
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
621
1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
700
2327
Name AMD Radeon HD 7650A NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
PassMark - G3D Mark 569 567
PassMark - G2D Mark 287 195
Geekbench - OpenCL 9507 2113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.429 5.218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 259.825 207.789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.435 0.52
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.298 10.149
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 53.841 23.677
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 621 1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 700 2327
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 621 1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 700 2327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 894
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 894

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 7650A NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 Fermi
Code name Onega GF108
Launch date 5 January 2012 13 January 2011
Launch price (MSRP) $262 $174.95
Place in performance rating 1448 1449
Price now $262 $99.95
Type Desktop Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100) 3.94 8.91

Technical info

Core clock speed 600 MHz 700 MHz
Floating-point performance 576.0 gflops 268.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 480 96
Texture fill rate 14.4 GTexel / s 11.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 716 million 585 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.4 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0