NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon HD 7650A

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 510 and AMD Radeon HD 7650A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
• Around 33% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 600 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 701 vs 571
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 290 vs 287
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.809 vs 4.429
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 976 vs 621
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1720 vs 700
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 976 vs 621
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1720 vs 700

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7650A

• Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 480 vs 192
• Around 88% better floating-point performance: 576.0 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
• Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
• 5.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9507 vs 1677
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 259.825 vs 111.269
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.435 vs 0.399
• 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.298 vs 3.385
• 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.841 vs 9.522

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 510
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7650A

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	701 571
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	290 287
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1677 9507
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.809 4.429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	111.269 259.825
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.399 0.435
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.385 13.298
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.522 53.841
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	976 621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 700
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	976 621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 700

Compare specifications (specs)