AMD Radeon HD 7570M vs AMD Radeon HD 7650A
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7570M and AMD Radeon HD 7650A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570M
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1797 vs 621
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2352 vs 700
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1797 vs 621
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2352 vs 700
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1797 vs 621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2352 vs 700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1797 vs 621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2352 vs 700 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7650A
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 480 vs 400
- Around 20% better floating-point performance: 576.0 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 569 vs 427
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 287 vs 190
- 8.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9507 vs 1085
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.429 vs 3.109
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 259.825 vs 199.164
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.435 vs 0.333
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.298 vs 10.489
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.841 vs 42.722
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 vs 400 |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops vs 480.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 569 vs 427 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 287 vs 190 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9507 vs 1085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.429 vs 3.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 259.825 vs 199.164 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.435 vs 0.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.298 vs 10.489 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.841 vs 42.722 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7570M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7650A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7570M | AMD Radeon HD 7650A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 427 | 569 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 190 | 287 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1085 | 9507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.109 | 4.429 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 199.164 | 259.825 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.333 | 0.435 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.489 | 13.298 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.722 | 53.841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 905 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1797 | 621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2352 | 700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 905 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1797 | 621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2352 | 700 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7570M | AMD Radeon HD 7650A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Thames | Onega |
Launch date | 7 January 2012 | 5 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1446 | 1447 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $262 | |
Price now | $262 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.94 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 400 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | 14.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |