AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 686 MHz vs 550 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 473 vs 456
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 130 vs 88
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 3315
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 3315
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2012 vs 14 August 2008 |
Core clock speed | 686 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 473 vs 456 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 130 vs 88 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 3315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 3315 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 473 | 456 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 130 | 88 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1762 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1842 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1842 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | 3315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 | 3315 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Tesla |
Code name | Devastator | G92 |
Launch date | 15 May 2012 | 14 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1299 | 1302 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $925 | |
Price now | $925 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.12 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 686 MHz | 550 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,303 million | 754 million |
Floating-point performance | 352.0 gflops | |
Pipelines | 128 | |
Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | MXM-HE |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 |