NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M vs AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M and AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 686 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 798 vs 473
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 149 vs 130
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3874 vs 1762
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1589 vs 843
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3235 vs 1842
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1589 vs 843
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3235 vs 1842
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 April 2013 vs 15 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 686 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 798 vs 473 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 vs 130 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3874 vs 1762 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1589 vs 843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3235 vs 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1589 vs 843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3235 vs 1842 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 3339 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 798 | 473 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | 130 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3874 | 1762 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.392 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.479 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.864 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.101 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.77 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1589 | 843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3235 | 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1589 | 843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3235 | 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 3347 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 345 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 3 |
Code name | GK107 | Devastator |
Launch date | 1 April 2013 | 15 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1303 | 1304 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 686 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 15.68 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,303 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |