NVIDIA Quadro K610M vs AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K610M and AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K610M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 686 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 718 vs 476
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 219 vs 131
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1993 vs 1761
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1123 vs 843
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2253 vs 1842
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1123 vs 843
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2253 vs 1842
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 15 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 686 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 718 vs 476 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 vs 131 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1993 vs 1761 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1123 vs 843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2253 vs 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1123 vs 843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2253 vs 1842 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 3195
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 3195
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 3195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 3195 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K610M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K610M | AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 718 | 476 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 | 131 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1993 | 1761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 182.093 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.881 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1123 | 843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2253 | 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3195 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1123 | 843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2253 | 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3195 | 3347 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K610M | AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | TeraScale 3 |
Code name | GK208 | Devastator |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 15 May 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1298 | 1301 |
Price now | $75 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.43 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 686 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 376.3 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | |
Texture fill rate | 15.68 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 1270 Million | 1,303 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | IGP |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 20.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |