NVIDIA Quadro K610M vs AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K610M and AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K610M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 43% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 686 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
  • Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 718 vs 476
  • Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 219 vs 131
  • Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1993 vs 1761
  • Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1123 vs 843
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2253 vs 1842
  • Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1123 vs 843
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2253 vs 1842
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 July 2013 vs 15 May 2012
Core clock speed 980 MHz vs 686 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 32 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 718 vs 476
PassMark - G2D Mark 219 vs 131
Geekbench - OpenCL 1993 vs 1761
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1123 vs 843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2253 vs 1842
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1123 vs 843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2253 vs 1842

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP

  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 3195
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 3195
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3347 vs 3195
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3347 vs 3195

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K610M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
718
476
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
219
131
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1993
1761
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1123
843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2253
1842
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3195
3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1123
843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2253
1842
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3195
3347
Name NVIDIA Quadro K610M AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark 718 476
PassMark - G2D Mark 219 131
Geekbench - OpenCL 1993 1761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 182.093
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 20.881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1123 843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2253 1842
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3195 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1123 843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2253 1842
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3195 3347

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K610M AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP

Essentials

Architecture Kepler 2.0 TeraScale 3
Code name GK208 Devastator
Launch date 23 July 2013 15 May 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $229.99
Place in performance rating 1298 1301
Price now $75
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 11.43

Technical info

Core clock speed 980 MHz 686 MHz
Floating-point performance 376.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 32 nm
Pipelines 192
Texture fill rate 15.68 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 1270 Million 1,303 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) IGP
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.4
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 20.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 2600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus