AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM vs AMD FirePro V5900
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM and AMD FirePro V5900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 768.0 gflops vs 614.4 gflops
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 66 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11715 vs 2880
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 71.832 vs 66.259
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2385 vs 2091
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2385 vs 2091
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2012 vs 24 May 2011 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 768.0 gflops vs 614.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 66 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11715 vs 2880 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 71.832 vs 66.259 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2385 vs 2091 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2385 vs 2091 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V5900
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 512 vs 480
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1263 vs 808
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 354 vs 327
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.167 vs 7.266
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.772 vs 0.464
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1713 vs 1366
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5078 vs 3357
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1713 vs 1366
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5078 vs 3357
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 512 vs 480 |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1263 vs 808 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 354 vs 327 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.167 vs 7.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.772 vs 0.464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1713 vs 1366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5078 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1713 vs 1366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5078 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V5900
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM | AMD FirePro V5900 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 808 | 1263 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 327 | 354 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11715 | 2880 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.266 | 8.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.464 | 0.772 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 71.832 | 66.259 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1366 | 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2385 | 2091 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 5078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1366 | 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2385 | 2091 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 5078 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 409.102 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.064 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM | AMD FirePro V5900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 3 |
Code name | Turks | Cayman |
Launch date | 5 January 2012 | 24 May 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1099 | 1101 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 768.0 gflops | 614.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 66 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 2,640 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 230 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |