AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP and NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48
- Around 20% better floating-point performance: 127.2 gflops vs 105.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 261 vs 159
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 68 vs 53
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2013 vs 22 February 2011 |
Pipelines | 128 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 127.2 gflops vs 105.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 261 vs 159 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 68 vs 53 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 589 MHz vs 497 MHz
- Around 91% higher texture fill rate: 7.6 GTexel / s vs 3.976 GTexel / s
- 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4683 vs 1082
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1062 vs 980
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1062 vs 980
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 589 MHz vs 497 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 7.6 GTexel / s vs 3.976 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4683 vs 1082 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1062 vs 980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1062 vs 980 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP | NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 261 | 159 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 68 | 53 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1082 | 4683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 470 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 470 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 619 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 619 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 980 | 1062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 980 | 1062 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP | NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Kalindi | GT218 |
Launch date | 13 August 2013 | 22 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1612 | 1615 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 497 MHz | 589 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 127.2 gflops | 105.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 3.976 GTexel / s | 7.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,178 million | 260 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz |