Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 15 Watt
  • Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 322 vs 259
  • Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 94 vs 68
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 476 vs 470
  • Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1000 vs 619
  • Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1701 vs 980
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 476 vs 470
  • Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1000 vs 619
  • Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1701 vs 980
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 11 December 2017 vs 13 August 2013
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 5 Watt vs 15 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 322 vs 259
PassMark - G2D Mark 94 vs 68
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 476 vs 470
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1000 vs 619
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1701 vs 980
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 476 vs 470
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1000 vs 619
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1701 vs 980

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP

  • 2.5x more core clock speed: 497 MHz vs 200 MHz
  • 10.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 12
  • Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1082 vs 1026
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 497 MHz vs 200 MHz
Pipelines 128 vs 12
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 1082 vs 1026

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
322
259
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
94
68
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1026
1082
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
476
470
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1000
619
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1701
980
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
476
470
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1000
619
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1701
980
Name Intel UHD Graphics 600 AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark 322 259
PassMark - G2D Mark 94 68
Geekbench - OpenCL 1026 1082
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 7.529
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 75.815
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 8.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 11.584
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 476 470
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1000 619
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1701 980
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 476 470
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1000 619
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1701 980
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 600 AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN 2.0
Code name Gemini Lake GT1 Kalindi
Launch date 11 December 2017 13 August 2013
Place in performance rating 1611 1612
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 750 MHz
Core clock speed 200 MHz 497 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 12 128
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 5 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,178 million
Floating-point performance 127.2 gflops
Texture fill rate 3.976 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 IGP

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit
Memory type DDR4 / LPDDR4 System Shared
Shared memory 1

Technologies

Quick Sync