Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 320 vs 265
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 93 vs 68
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 476 vs 470
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1000 vs 619
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1701 vs 980
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 476 vs 470
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1000 vs 619
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1701 vs 980
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 December 2017 vs 13 August 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 320 vs 265 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 93 vs 68 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 476 vs 470 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 vs 619 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 vs 980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 476 vs 470 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 vs 619 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 vs 980 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 497 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 10.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 12
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1126 vs 995
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 497 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 128 vs 12 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1126 vs 995 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 320 | 265 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 93 | 68 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 995 | 1126 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.529 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 75.815 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.495 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.178 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 11.584 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 476 | 470 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 | 619 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 | 980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 476 | 470 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 | 619 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 | 980 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 600 | AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Gemini Lake GT1 | Kalindi |
Launch date | 11 December 2017 | 13 August 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1617 | 1619 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 750 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 497 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 12 | 128 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,178 million |
Floating-point performance | 127.2 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 3.976 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | System Shared |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |