AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP vs AMD Radeon HD 8250
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP and AMD Radeon HD 8250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 497 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 265 vs 212
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 68 vs 59
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1126 vs 1075
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 470 vs 384
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 470 vs 384
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2013 vs 1 June 2013 |
Core clock speed | 497 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 265 vs 212 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 68 vs 59 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1126 vs 1075 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 470 vs 384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 470 vs 384 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8250
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 628 vs 619
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 628 vs 619
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1343 vs 980
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1343 vs 980
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 628 vs 619 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 628 vs 619 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1343 vs 980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1343 vs 980 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8250
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP | AMD Radeon HD 8250 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 265 | 212 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 68 | 59 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1126 | 1075 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 470 | 384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 470 | 384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 619 | 628 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 619 | 628 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 980 | 1343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 980 | 1343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP | AMD Radeon HD 8250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | Kalindi | Temash |
Launch date | 13 August 2013 | 1 June 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1619 | 1620 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 497 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 127.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 3.976 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,178 million | |
Boost clock speed | 400 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | |
Shared memory | 1 |