AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP and NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 93% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 29 Watt
Launch date | 13 August 2013 vs 2 April 2012 |
Pipelines | 128 vs 48 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 29 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 497 MHz
- Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 6.5 billion / sec vs 3.976 GTexel / s
- Around 22% better floating-point performance: 155.5 gflops vs 127.2 gflops
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 317 vs 267
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 129 vs 68
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1281 vs 1085
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 555 vs 470
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 555 vs 470
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 835 vs 619
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 835 vs 619
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1155 vs 980
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1155 vs 980
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 497 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 6.5 billion / sec vs 3.976 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops vs 127.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 317 vs 267 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 129 vs 68 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1281 vs 1085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 555 vs 470 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 555 vs 470 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 835 vs 619 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 835 vs 619 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1155 vs 980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1155 vs 980 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 267 | 317 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 68 | 129 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1085 | 1281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 470 | 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 470 | 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 619 | 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 619 | 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 980 | 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 980 | 1155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.471 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 77.99 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.233 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.018 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.053 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 87 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8330 IGP | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Kalindi | GF119 |
Launch date | 13 August 2013 | 2 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1618 | 1621 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
Price now | $39.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.13 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 497 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 127.2 gflops | 155.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 3.976 GTexel / s | 6.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 29 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,178 million | 292 million |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 102 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1024 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA |