AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs ATI Mobility Radeon 7500
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP and ATI Mobility Radeon 7500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 74% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 230 MHz
- 64x more pipelines: 128 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 27 Watt
- 65.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 262 vs 4
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 November 2013 vs 1 December 2001 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 230 MHz |
Pipelines | 128 vs 2 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 27 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 262 vs 4 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon 7500
- 175x more texture fill rate: 560 MTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 103 vs 78
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 560 MTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 103 vs 78 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon 7500
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP | ATI Mobility Radeon 7500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 262 | 4 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 78 | 103 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1205 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.197 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1322.192 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.774 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.241 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 224.569 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 930 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1631 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 930 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1631 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP | ATI Mobility Radeon 7500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Rage 7 |
Code name | Kalindi | M7 |
Launch date | 23 November 2013 | 1 December 2001 |
Place in performance rating | 1352 | 1350 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 230 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 102.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 2 |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s | 560 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 27 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,178 million | 60 million |
Boost clock speed | 280 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | AGP 4x |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 7.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | 64 / 128 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 3.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 200 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 366 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 |