AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs Intel HD Graphics 4600

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• 6.4x more pipelines: 128 vs 20
• 2x better floating-point performance: 102.4 gflops vs 50 gflops
• Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 45 Watt
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.197 vs 8.844
• 7.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1322.192 vs 171.17
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.774 vs 1.115
• 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.241 vs 10.385
• 18.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 224.569 vs 12.361

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 5 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 629 vs 267
• 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 77
• 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3211 vs 1207
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 vs 930
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 vs 1631
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 vs 930
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 vs 1631

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	267 629
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	77 314
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1207 3211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.197 8.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1322.192 171.17
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.774 1.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	47.241 10.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	224.569 12.361
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	930 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1631 2808
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	930 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1631 2808

Compare specifications (specs)