AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs Intel HD Graphics 4600

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

Intel HD Graphics 4600

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
6.4x more pipelines: 128 vs 20
2x better floating-point performance: 102.4 gflops vs 50 gflops
Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 45 Watt
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.197 vs 8.844
7.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1322.192 vs 171.17
Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.774 vs 1.115
4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.241 vs 10.385
18.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 224.569 vs 12.361

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 November 2013 vs 3 June 2013
Pipelines	128 vs 20
Floating-point performance	102.4 gflops vs 50 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	18.197 vs 8.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1322.192 vs 171.17
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.774 vs 1.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	47.241 vs 10.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	224.569 vs 12.361

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 5 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 629 vs 261
4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 315 vs 78
2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3228 vs 1202
Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 vs 930
Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 vs 1631
Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 vs 930
Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 vs 1631

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	5 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	629 vs 261
PassMark - G2D Mark	315 vs 78
Geekbench - OpenCL	3228 vs 1202
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1702 vs 930
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2808 vs 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1702 vs 930
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2808 vs 1631

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

261

629

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

315

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1202

3228

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

18.197

8.844

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1322.192

171.17

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.774

1.115

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

47.241

10.385

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

224.569

12.361

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

930

1702

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1631

2808

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

930

1702

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1631

2808

Name	AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP	Intel HD Graphics 4600
PassMark - G3D Mark	261	629
PassMark - G2D Mark	78	315
Geekbench - OpenCL	1202	3228
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	18.197	8.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1322.192	171.17
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.774	1.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	47.241	10.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	224.569	12.361
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	930	1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1631	2808
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	930	1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1631	2808
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		988
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		988
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		194

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP	Intel HD Graphics 4600
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Generation 7.5
Code name	Kalindi	Haswell GT2
Launch date	23 November 2013	3 June 2013
Place in performance rating	1350	1351
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	400 MHz	400 MHz
Floating-point performance	102.4 gflops	50 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	22 nm
Pipelines	128	20
Texture fill rate	3.2 GTexel / s	5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	1,178 million	392 million
Boost clock speed		1250 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	PCIe 1.0 x16
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.3
Memory
Memory type	System Shared
Memory bus width		64 / 128 Bit
Shared memory		1
Technologies
Quick Sync