AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
• 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 108 Watt
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 78 vs 58

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

• Around 50% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 12x more texture fill rate: 38.4 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 192 vs 128
• 4.5x better floating-point performance: 462.3 gflops vs 102.4 gflops
• 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 798 vs 261
• 11.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13337 vs 1202
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3258 vs 1631
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3258 vs 1631

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	261 798
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	78 58
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1202 13337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1631 3258
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1631 3258

Compare specifications (specs)