AMD Radeon HD 8550D IGP vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8550D IGP and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8550D IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 760 MHz vs 706 MHz
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 122 Watt
Launch date | 23 May 2013 vs 17 August 2012 |
Core clock speed | 760 MHz vs 706 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 122 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3992 vs 567
- Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 432 vs 226
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3992 vs 567 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 432 vs 226 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8550D IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8550D IGP | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 567 | 3992 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 226 | 432 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11459 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.318 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 681.141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.062 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.922 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.311 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6288 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3680 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6288 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3680 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8550D IGP | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Kepler |
Code name | Scrapper | GK104 |
Launch date | 23 May 2013 | 17 August 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 705 | 706 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Price now | $1,950 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.47 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 844 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 760 MHz | 706 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 122 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,303 million | 3,540 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,169 gflops | |
Pipelines | 1536 | |
Texture fill rate | 90.37 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 172.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |