AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 46% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 500 MHz
  • 4.7x more texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s
  • 4.8x more pipelines: 384 vs 80
  • 7.5x better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 80 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • 5.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 942 vs 181
  • 9.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.899 vs 7.489
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2540 vs 904
  • Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 1733
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2540 vs 904
  • Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 1733
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 8 January 2013 vs 7 January 2010
Core clock speed 730 MHz vs 500 MHz
Texture fill rate 18.72 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 80
Floating-point performance 599.0 gflops vs 80 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 942 vs 181
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 72.899 vs 7.489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2540 vs 904
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 vs 1733
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2540 vs 904
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 vs 1733

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430

  • 7.1x lower typical power consumption: 7 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 330 vs 278
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 7 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 330 vs 278

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
942
181
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
278
330
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
72.899
7.489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2540
904
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
1733
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2540
904
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
1733
Name AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430
PassMark - G3D Mark 942 181
PassMark - G2D Mark 278 330
Geekbench - OpenCL 5913
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.771
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 285.896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.949
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 72.899 7.489
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1759
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2540 904
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 1733
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1759
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2540 904
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 1733

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 TeraScale 2
Code name Oland Park
Launch date 8 January 2013 7 January 2010
Place in performance rating 1153 1156
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 780 MHz
Core clock speed 730 MHz 500 MHz
Floating-point performance 599.0 gflops 80 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 80
Texture fill rate 18.72 GTexel / s 4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 7 Watt
Transistor count 1,040 million 292 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s 12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type GDDR3 DDR3, GDDR5?
Shared memory 0