NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M vs AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M and AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 967 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 65% higher texture fill rate: 30.94 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- Around 24% better floating-point performance: 742.7 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1332 vs 943
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.67 vs 14.771
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2351 vs 1759
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3520 vs 2540
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2351 vs 1759
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3520 vs 2540
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 941 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 967 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 30.94 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1332 vs 943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.67 vs 14.771 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2351 vs 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3520 vs 2540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2351 vs 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3520 vs 2540 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 281 vs 244
- Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5970 vs 4261
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 285.896 vs 251.09
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.219 vs 1.144
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.949 vs 10.872
- 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.899 vs 13.423
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3334
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3334
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 281 vs 244 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5970 vs 4261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 285.896 vs 251.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.219 vs 1.144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.949 vs 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.899 vs 13.423 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3334 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3334 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1332 | 943 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 | 281 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4261 | 5970 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.67 | 14.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.09 | 285.896 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.144 | 1.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.872 | 24.949 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.423 | 72.899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2351 | 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3520 | 2540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2351 | 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3520 | 2540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 461 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK107 | Oland |
Launch date | 9 January 2013 | 8 January 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1155 | 1156 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 967 MHz | 780 MHz |
Core clock speed | 941 MHz | 730 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 30.94 GTexel / s | 18.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |