AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
  • Around 1% better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 595.2 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
  • Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1250 MHz
  • Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 286 vs 260
  • Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6207 vs 4723
  • Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.771 vs 13.598
  • Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.899 vs 44.123
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 8 January 2013 vs 30 May 2011
Pipelines 384 vs 192
Floating-point performance 599.0 gflops vs 595.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1536 MB
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1250 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 286 vs 260
Geekbench - OpenCL 6207 vs 4723
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.771 vs 13.598
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 72.899 vs 44.123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 vs 3341
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 vs 3341

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M

  • Around 6% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 730 MHz
  • Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 24.8 billion / sec vs 18.72 GTexel / s
  • Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1245 vs 940
  • Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 404.618 vs 285.896
  • Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.227 vs 1.129
  • Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.333 vs 24.949
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1857 vs 1759
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 vs 2540
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1857 vs 1759
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 vs 2540
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 775 MHz vs 730 MHz
Texture fill rate 24.8 billion / sec vs 18.72 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1245 vs 940
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 404.618 vs 285.896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.227 vs 1.129
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 25.333 vs 24.949
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1857 vs 1759
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3275 vs 2540
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1857 vs 1759
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3275 vs 2540

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
940
1245
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
286
260
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6207
4723
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14.771
13.598
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
285.896
404.618
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.129
1.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
24.949
25.333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
72.899
44.123
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1759
1857
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2540
3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1759
1857
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2540
3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
3341
Name AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
PassMark - G3D Mark 940 1245
PassMark - G2D Mark 286 260
Geekbench - OpenCL 6207 4723
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.771 13.598
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 285.896 404.618
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.129 1.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.949 25.333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 72.899 44.123
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1759 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2540 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1759 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2540 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 3341
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Fermi 2.0
Code name Oland GF116
Launch date 8 January 2013 30 May 2011
Place in performance rating 1148 1150
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 780 MHz
Core clock speed 730 MHz 775 MHz
Floating-point performance 599.0 gflops 595.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 192
Texture fill rate 18.72 GTexel / s 24.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 1,040 million 1,170 million
CUDA cores 192

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors None None
Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Laptop size large
SLI options 2-way

API support

DirectX 12.0 12 API
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1536 MB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1250 MHz
Memory type GDDR3 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus