AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- Around 1% better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 595.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 283 vs 264
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6014 vs 4769
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.771 vs 13.598
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.899 vs 44.123
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 January 2013 vs 30 May 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops vs 595.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1536 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 283 vs 264 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6014 vs 4769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.771 vs 13.598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.899 vs 44.123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3341 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 24.8 billion / sec vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1268 vs 943
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 404.618 vs 285.896
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.227 vs 1.219
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.333 vs 24.949
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1857 vs 1759
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 vs 2540
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1857 vs 1759
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 vs 2540
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.8 billion / sec vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1268 vs 943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 404.618 vs 285.896 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.227 vs 1.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.333 vs 24.949 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1857 vs 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 vs 2540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1857 vs 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 vs 2540 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 943 | 1268 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 283 | 264 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6014 | 4769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.771 | 13.598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 285.896 | 404.618 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.219 | 1.227 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.949 | 25.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.899 | 44.123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1759 | 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2540 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1759 | 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2540 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3341 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Oland | GF116 |
Launch date | 8 January 2013 | 30 May 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1155 | 1158 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 24.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,170 million |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |