AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 50 Watt
Launch date | 21 December 2013 vs 8 January 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 3.7x more texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 160
- 3x better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 35% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1334 MHz
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2540 vs 1681
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2540 vs 1681
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3290
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3290
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops vs 200.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1334 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2540 vs 1681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2540 vs 1681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3290 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1681 | 2540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1681 | 2540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | 3355 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 942 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 278 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5913 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.771 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 285.896 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.949 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.899 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1759 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1759 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Caicos | Oland |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 | 8 January 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1151 | 1153 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 730 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 18.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 1,040 million |
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 10.67 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1334 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |