AMD Radeon HD 8670M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8670M and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8670M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
• Around 5% better floating-point performance: 633.6 gflops vs 601.3 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 71.696 vs 49.9

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 783 MHz vs 775 MHz
• Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 25.06 GTexel / s vs 19.8 GTexel / s
• 2x more memory clock speed: 3608 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.611 vs 6.559
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 422.002 vs 144.131
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.255 vs 0.952
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.132 vs 17.551
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2166 vs 1039
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3360 vs 1783
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3313 vs 2270
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2166 vs 1039
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3360 vs 1783
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3313 vs 2270

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8670M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.559 12.611
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	144.131 422.002
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.952 1.255
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.551 25.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	71.696 49.9
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1039 2166
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1783 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2270 3313
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1039 2166
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1783 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2270 3313

Compare specifications (specs)