AMD Radeon HD 8670M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8670M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8670M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 5x more texture fill rate: 19.8 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 384 vs 80
- 7.9x better floating-point performance: 633.6 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 520 vs 181
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 488 vs 330
- 9.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 71.696 vs 7.489
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1783 vs 904
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2270 vs 1733
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1783 vs 904
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2270 vs 1733
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 vs 7 January 2010 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 520 vs 181 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 vs 330 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 71.696 vs 7.489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1783 vs 904 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2270 vs 1733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1783 vs 904 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2270 vs 1733 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8670M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8670M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 520 | 181 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 | 330 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5532 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.559 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 144.131 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.952 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.551 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 71.696 | 7.489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1039 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1783 | 904 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2270 | 1733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1039 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1783 | 904 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2270 | 1733 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8670M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Mars | Park |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1162 | 1165 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s | 4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 292 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5? |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |