Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs AMD Radeon HD 8670M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and AMD Radeon HD 8670M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 775 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1346 vs 520
• Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6440 vs 5532
• 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.485 vs 6.559
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 246.614 vs 144.131
• Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.888 vs 0.952
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.014 vs 17.551
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2306 vs 1039
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 2270
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2306 vs 1039
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 2270

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8670M

• 2.6x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 488 vs 340
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 71.696 vs 42.981
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1783 vs 1514
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1783 vs 1514

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8670M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1346 520
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	340 488
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6440 5532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	36.485 6.559
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	246.614 144.131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.888 0.952
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.014 17.551
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.981 71.696
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2306 1039
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 1783
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 2270
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2306 1039
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 1783
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 2270

Compare specifications (specs)