AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4574 vs 3333
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4574 vs 3333
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2013 vs 30 May 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4574 vs 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4574 vs 3333 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 55.23 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 1,326 gflops vs 614.4 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 vs 1166
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 vs 1166
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 vs 2589
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 vs 2589
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 55.23 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,326 gflops vs 614.4 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3188 vs 1166 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3188 vs 1166 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 vs 2589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 vs 2589 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1166 | 3188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1166 | 3188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2589 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2589 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4574 | 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4574 | 3333 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2010 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 289 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7240 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.832 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 520.747 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.935 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.952 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 43.535 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 759 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Cape Verde | GK106 |
Launch date | 5 September 2013 | 30 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1032 | 1033 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 614.4 gflops | 1,326 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s | 55.23 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 2,540 million |
Boost clock speed | 863 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
Verde Drivers |