AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro K3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 654 MHz
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 61% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 2800 MHz
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4574 vs 3353
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4574 vs 3353
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2013 vs 1 June 2012 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 654 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 2800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4574 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4574 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
- Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 31.39 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 576 vs 384
- Around 23% better floating-point performance: 753.4 gflops vs 614.4 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2527 vs 1166
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2527 vs 1166
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3505 vs 2589
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3505 vs 2589
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 31.39 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 576 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 753.4 gflops vs 614.4 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2527 vs 1166 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2527 vs 1166 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 vs 2589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 vs 2589 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro K3000M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1166 | 2527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1166 | 2527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2589 | 3505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2589 | 3505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4574 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4574 | 3353 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1643 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 339 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4199 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.45 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 403.983 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.992 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.202 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 24.266 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro K3000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Cape Verde | GK104 |
Launch date | 5 September 2013 | 1 June 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1032 | 1033 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $155 | |
Price now | $155 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.57 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 654 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 614.4 gflops | 753.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 576 |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s | 31.39 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 89.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |