NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 vs AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 77% higher texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- Around 32% better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 614.4 gflops
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 1166
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 2589
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 1166
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 2589
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 November 2013 vs 5 September 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops vs 614.4 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 vs 1166 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 vs 2589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 vs 1166 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 vs 2589 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 64 Watt
- 900x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4574 vs 3332
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4574 vs 3332
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 64 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4574 vs 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4574 vs 3332 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1751 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4486 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 | 1166 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 | 2589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 4574 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 | 1166 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 | 2589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 4574 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK106 | Cape Verde |
| Launch date | 27 November 2013 | 5 September 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1029 | 1031 |
| Price now | $144.81 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 800 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops | 614.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec | 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 47 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128-bit GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | 4500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8730 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDRadeon E8860
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM
