AMD Radeon HD 8750M vs NVIDIA GeForce 615

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8750M and NVIDIA GeForce 615 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8750M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • 3.5x more texture fill rate: 18.6 GTexel / s vs 5.28 GTexel / s
  • 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
  • 4.7x better floating-point performance: 595.2 gflops vs 126.7 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 986 vs 546
  • 5.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5996 vs 1162
  • 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.274 vs 3.257
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1734 vs 668
  • Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2221 vs 1286
  • Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1708
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1734 vs 668
  • Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2221 vs 1286
  • Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1708
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 26 February 2013 vs 15 May 2012
Texture fill rate 18.6 GTexel / s vs 5.28 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 48
Floating-point performance 595.2 gflops vs 126.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 986 vs 546
Geekbench - OpenCL 5996 vs 1162
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.274 vs 3.257
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1734 vs 668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2221 vs 1286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 vs 1708
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1734 vs 668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2221 vs 1286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 vs 1708

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 615

  • Around 6% higher core clock speed: 660 MHz vs 620 MHz
  • Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 312 vs 203
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 660 MHz vs 620 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 312 vs 203

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8750M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 615

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
986
546
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
203
312
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5996
1162
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8.274
3.257
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1734
668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2221
1286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
1708
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1734
668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2221
1286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
1708
Name AMD Radeon HD 8750M NVIDIA GeForce 615
PassMark - G3D Mark 986 546
PassMark - G2D Mark 203 312
Geekbench - OpenCL 5996 1162
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.274 3.257
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 271.177
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.834
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 70.596
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1734 668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2221 1286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 1708
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1734 668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2221 1286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 1708
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 8750M NVIDIA GeForce 615

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Fermi
Code name Mars GF108
Design AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series
Launch date 26 February 2013 15 May 2012
Place in performance rating 1280 1293
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 775 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 620 MHz 660 MHz
Floating-point performance 595.2 gflops 126.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 48
Texture fill rate 18.6 GTexel / s 5.28 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,040 million 585 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 49 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 11 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.4 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 64 GB / s 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
Shared memory 0