AMD Radeon HD 8750M vs NVIDIA GeForce 615
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8750M and NVIDIA GeForce 615 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8750M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 18.6 GTexel / s vs 5.28 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- 4.7x better floating-point performance: 595.2 gflops vs 126.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 986 vs 546
- 5.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5996 vs 1162
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.274 vs 3.257
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1734 vs 668
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2221 vs 1286
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1708
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1734 vs 668
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2221 vs 1286
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1708
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 February 2013 vs 15 May 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 18.6 GTexel / s vs 5.28 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops vs 126.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 986 vs 546 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5996 vs 1162 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.274 vs 3.257 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1734 vs 668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 vs 1286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 1708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1734 vs 668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 vs 1286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 1708 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 615
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 660 MHz vs 620 MHz
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 312 vs 203
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 660 MHz vs 620 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 vs 203 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8750M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 615
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8750M | NVIDIA GeForce 615 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 986 | 546 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 | 312 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5996 | 1162 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.274 | 3.257 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 271.177 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.834 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.596 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1734 | 668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 | 1286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 1708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1734 | 668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 | 1286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 1708 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8750M | NVIDIA GeForce 615 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Mars | GF108 |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Launch date | 26 February 2013 | 15 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1280 | 1293 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 660 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | 126.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 18.6 GTexel / s | 5.28 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 585 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |