NVIDIA GeForce 820A vs AMD Radeon HD 8750M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 820A and AMD Radeon HD 8750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 820A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 620 MHz
Launch date | 17 March 2014 vs 26 February 2013 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 620 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8750M
- Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 18.6 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 2x better floating-point performance: 595.2 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1014 vs 556
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 202 vs 158
- Around 95% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5864 vs 3003
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2221 vs 1716
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2221 vs 1716
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1705
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1705
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 18.6 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops vs 297.6 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1014 vs 556 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 202 vs 158 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5864 vs 3003 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 vs 1716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 vs 1716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 1705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 1705 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820A
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8750M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 820A | AMD Radeon HD 8750M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 556 | 1014 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 | 202 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3003 | 5864 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1716 | 2221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1716 | 2221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1705 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1705 | 3351 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.274 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 271.177 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.834 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.596 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1734 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1734 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 820A | AMD Radeon HD 8750M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GF117 | Mars |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 | 26 February 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1284 | 1286 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 620 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | 18.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,040 million |
Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |