AMD Radeon HD 8750M vs AMD Radeon HD 7640G
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8750M and AMD Radeon HD 7640G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8750M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 620 MHz vs 497 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 775 MHz vs 686 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1022 vs 456
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 200 vs 123
- 5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5884 vs 1188
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1734 vs 636
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1734 vs 636
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 26 February 2013 vs 15 May 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz vs 497 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 775 MHz vs 686 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1022 vs 456 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 200 vs 123 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5884 vs 1188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1734 vs 636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1734 vs 636 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7640G
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2245 vs 2221
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2245 vs 2221
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2245 vs 2221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2245 vs 2221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8750M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7640G
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 8750M | AMD Radeon HD 7640G |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1022 | 456 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 200 | 123 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5884 | 1188 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.274 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 271.177 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.505 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.834 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.596 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1734 | 636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 | 2245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1734 | 636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 | 2245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 8750M | AMD Radeon HD 7640G | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Terascale 3 |
| Code name | Mars | Trinity |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
| Launch date | 26 February 2013 | 15 May 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1285 | 1286 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | 686 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 497 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 256 |
| Texture fill rate | 18.6 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |

