AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 384.0 GTexel / s vs 109.8 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1344
- 4.7x better floating-point performance: 12,288 gflops vs 2,634 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
- 4.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70814 vs 14380
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 27 September 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s vs 109.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 1344 |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops vs 2,634 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70814 vs 14380 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Around 76% lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1704 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 1634
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 1634
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1846
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1846
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1704 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 1634 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 1634 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 1846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 1846 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6958 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6958 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1634 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1634 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1846 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1846 | 3357 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70814 | 14380 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5209 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.336 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1351.496 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.121 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.14 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 156.419 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Vega 10 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 27 September 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 571 | 574 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | 2,634 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 1344 |
| Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s | 109.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12,500 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 241 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 482.8 GB / s | 192.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1704 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 with others
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6610 XL
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
ATIRadeon E2400
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
AMDRadeon R9 260 OEM
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
NVIDIAGRID K120Q
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
NVIDIACMP 50HX
