AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO W7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO W7600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 43% higher boost clock speed: 2440 MHz vs 1710 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 320 Watt
- Around 89% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
Launch date | 3 Aug 2023 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2440 MHz vs 1710 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 320 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Around 49% higher texture fill rate: 465.1 GTexel/s vs 312.3 GTexel/s
- 4.3x more pipelines: 8704 vs 2048
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 10 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1048 vs 1029
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25178 vs 14474
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 167014 vs 81272
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 465.1 GTexel/s vs 312.3 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 8704 vs 2048 |
Maximum memory size | 10 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 vs 1029 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25178 vs 14474 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167014 vs 81272 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO W7600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon PRO W7600 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1029 | 1048 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14474 | 25178 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 81272 | 167014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4417 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon PRO W7600 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 33 | GA102 |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2023 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 57 | 56 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2440 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 1720 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 8704 |
Pixel fill rate | 156.2 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 312.3 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 320 Watt |
Transistor count | 13300 million | 28300 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm, 9.5 inches | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | 700 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 115 mm, 4.5 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 10 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 320 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |