AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO W7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO W7600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 2440 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 89% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
Launch date | 3 Aug 2023 vs 31 May 2021 |
Core clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2440 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- Around 71% higher texture fill rate: 532.8 GTexel/s vs 312.3 GTexel/s
- 5x more pipelines: 10240 vs 2048
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1088 vs 1020
- Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 27115 vs 14227
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 vs 81272
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 532.8 GTexel/s vs 312.3 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10240 vs 2048 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 vs 1020 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27115 vs 14227 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 vs 81272 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO W7600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon PRO W7600 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1020 | 1088 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14227 | 27115 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 81272 | 209081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 497.768 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.977 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.265 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 128.381 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2390.028 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19794 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon PRO W7600 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 33 | GA102 |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2023 | 31 May 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 60 | 56 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1199 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2440 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 1720 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 10240 |
Pixel fill rate | 156.2 GPixel/s | 186.5 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 312.3 GTexel/s | 532.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 13300 million | 28300 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm, 9.5 inches | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | 750 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 115 mm, 4.5 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 912.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |