AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs AMD Radeon RX 7600M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO W7600 and AMD Radeon RX 7600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO W7600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 2440 MHz vs 2410 MHz
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 312.3 GTexel/s vs 269.9 GTexel/s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1792
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1009 vs 867
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15953 vs 11582
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2023 vs 4 Jan 2023 |
Core clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2440 MHz vs 2410 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 312.3 GTexel/s vs 269.9 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1792 |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1009 vs 867 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15953 vs 11582 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 7600M
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 90 Watt vs 130 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO W7600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 7600M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon PRO W7600 | AMD Radeon RX 7600M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1009 | 867 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15953 | 11582 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 81272 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon PRO W7600 | AMD Radeon RX 7600M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
Code name | Navi 33 | Navi 33 |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2023 | 4 Jan 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 61 | 59 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2440 MHz | 2410 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | 28 |
Core clock speed | 1720 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 6 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 156.2 GPixel/s | 154.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 312.3 GTexel/s | 269.9 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 90 Watt |
Transistor count | 13300 million | 13300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | IGP |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Width | 115 mm, 4.5 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 2.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |