AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5650
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 325 MHz
- 30x more texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 11.9x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 590 MHz
- 108.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1841 vs 17
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 390 vs 211
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 vs 1 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 325 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 590 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1841 vs 17 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 390 vs 211 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 | NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1841 | 17 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 390 | 211 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10245 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.848 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 438.581 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.268 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.988 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.235 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3241 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3241 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 | NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Rankine |
Code name | Lexa | NV31 A1 |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 | 1 March 2003 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Place in performance rating | 831 | 828 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 325 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | 1.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 80 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | AGP 8x |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 56 GB / s | 9.44 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 590 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |