AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs AMD Radeon 530X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and AMD Radeon 530X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

AMD Radeon 530X

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
Around 27% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 730 MHz
Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1021 MHz
Around 59% higher texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 24.5 GTexel / s
Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
Around 59% better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 784.1 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 4000 MHz

Launch date	12 June 2017 vs 18 April 2017
Core clock speed	925 MHz vs 730 MHz
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz vs 1021 MHz
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s vs 24.5 GTexel / s
Pipelines	512 vs 384
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops vs 784.1 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz vs 4000 MHz

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 530X

Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28019 vs 10208

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	28019 vs 10208

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 530X

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

10208

28019

Name	AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100	AMD Radeon 530X
PassMark - G3D Mark	1841
PassMark - G2D Mark	390
Geekbench - OpenCL	10208	28019
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	30.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	438.581
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	46.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	139.235
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3241
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3241
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100	AMD Radeon 530X
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Lexa	Meso
Launch date	12 June 2017	18 April 2017
Launch price (MSRP)	$149
Place in performance rating	831	832
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz	1021 MHz
Core clock speed	925 MHz	730 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops	784.1 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	384
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s	24.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	50 Watt
Transistor count	2,200 million	1,040 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	145 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	56 GB / s	32 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5