AMD Radeon Pro 450 vs AMD FirePro S7100X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 450 and AMD FirePro S7100X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 723 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 2% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Launch date | 30 October 2016 vs 25 May 2016 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7100X
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 92.54 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 640
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 2,961 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 64.888 vs 26.707
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1283.973 vs 568.609
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.781 vs 2.409
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 70.708 vs 39.784
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 315.677 vs 126.562
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops vs 1,024 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.888 vs 26.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1283.973 vs 568.609 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.781 vs 2.409 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.708 vs 39.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.677 vs 126.562 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 450
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S7100X
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 450 | AMD FirePro S7100X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2723 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 619 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9016 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.707 | 64.888 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 568.609 | 1283.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.409 | 5.781 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.784 | 70.708 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 126.562 | 315.677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3347 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1749 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3347 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1749 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 450 | AMD FirePro S7100X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Baffin | Amethyst |
Launch date | 30 October 2016 | 25 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 795 | 796 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 723 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 32 GTexel / s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 5,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |