AMD Radeon Pro 450 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 450 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 13.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 48
- Around 16% better floating-point performance: 1,024 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2723 vs 1471
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 619 vs 566
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9051 vs 4469
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3347 vs 2475
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1749 vs 958
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 2304
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3347 vs 2475
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1749 vs 958
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 2304
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 October 2016 vs 5 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 640 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops vs 883.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2723 vs 1471 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 619 vs 566 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9051 vs 4469 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3347 vs 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1749 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 vs 2304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3347 vs 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1749 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 vs 2304 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Around 73% higher texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 450
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 450 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2723 | 1471 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 619 | 566 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9051 | 4469 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.707 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 568.609 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.409 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 126.562 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3347 | 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1749 | 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 2304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3347 | 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1749 | 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 2304 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 450 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | Baffin | Broadwell GT3e |
Launch date | 30 October 2016 | 5 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 795 | 797 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 32 GTexel / s | 55.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 189 million |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 | ||
Quick Sync |