AMD Radeon Pro 450 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 450 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 450

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 2.7x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 13.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 48
  • Around 16% better floating-point performance: 1,024 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
  • Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2723 vs 1461
  • Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 619 vs 569
  • Around 99% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8908 vs 4467
  • Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3347 vs 2475
  • Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1749 vs 958
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 2304
  • Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3347 vs 2475
  • Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1749 vs 958
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 2304
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 October 2016 vs 5 September 2014
Core clock speed 800 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 640 vs 48
Floating-point performance 1,024 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2723 vs 1461
PassMark - G2D Mark 619 vs 569
Geekbench - OpenCL 8908 vs 4467
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3347 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1749 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3344 vs 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3347 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1749 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3344 vs 2304

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

  • Around 73% higher texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Texture fill rate 55.2 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 35 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 450
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2723
1461
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
619
569
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
8908
4467
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3347
2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1749
958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3344
2304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3347
2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1749
958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3344
2304
Name AMD Radeon Pro 450 Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
PassMark - G3D Mark 2723 1461
PassMark - G2D Mark 619 569
Geekbench - OpenCL 8908 4467
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 26.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 568.609
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 39.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 126.562
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3347 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1749 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3344 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3347 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1749 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3344 2304

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 450 Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Generation 8.0
Code name Baffin Broadwell GT3e
Launch date 30 October 2016 5 September 2014
Place in performance rating 788 789
Type Mobile workstation Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 800 MHz 300 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,024 gflops 883.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 640 48
Texture fill rate 32 GTexel / s 55.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 3,000 million 189 million
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x1
Laptop size large medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 81.28 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5080 MHz
Memory type GDDR5
Shared memory 0 1

Technologies

DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0
Quick Sync