AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs AMD Radeon Pro 570X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300 and AMD Radeon Pro 570X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1105 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 41% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1700 MHz (6800 MHz effective)
- Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38647 vs 27531
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 18 March 2019 |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1105 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1700 MHz (6800 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38647 vs 27531 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 570X
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1280
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1280 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 570X
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300 | AMD Radeon Pro 570X |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38647 | 27531 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 621 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7125 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 | AMD Radeon Pro 570X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 18 March 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 209 | 835 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1105 MHz |
Compute units | 20 | 28 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 264.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | 247.5 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.448 TFLOPS (2:1) | 3.960 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.224 TFLOPS | 3.960 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 52.80 GPixel/s | 35.36 GPixel/s |
Render output units | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 132.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 5700 million |
Stream Processors | 123.8 GTexel/s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 217.6 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1700 MHz (6800 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |