AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT vs ATI Radeon X1950 PRO
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT and ATI Radeon X1950 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1187 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 24449.3x more texture fill rate: 168.7 GTexel/s vs 6.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 80 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1380 MHz
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 1 October 2006 |
Core clock speed | 1187 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 168.7 GTexel/s vs 6.9 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1380 MHz |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1950 PRO
- Around 89% lower typical power consumption: 66 Watt vs 125 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 66 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1950 PRO
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT | ATI Radeon X1950 PRO |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42739 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 113 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 318 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT | ATI Radeon X1950 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | R500 |
Code name | Navi 14 | RV570 |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 1 October 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 509 | 511 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1757 MHz | |
Compute units | 24 | |
Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 80 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 337.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.80 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.398 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | |
Pixel fill rate | 56.22 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 168.7 GTexel/s | 6.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 66 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 330 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 9.0c |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 44.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1380 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |