AMD Radeon Pro 5500M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5500M and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 5x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6798 vs 4809
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 585
- Around 66% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 37248 vs 22421
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9175 vs 8870
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3670 vs 3586
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9175 vs 8870
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3670 vs 3586
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 14 November 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6798 vs 4809 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 vs 585 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 37248 vs 22421 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9175 vs 8870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 vs 3586 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9175 vs 8870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 vs 3586 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 85 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 85 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6798 | 4809 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 | 585 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 37248 | 22421 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.82 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1860.146 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.238 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.947 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 596.819 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9175 | 8870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 | 3586 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9175 | 8870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 | 3586 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3426 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | Navi 14 | Vega 12 |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 14 November 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 353 | 369 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1190 MHz |
| Compute units | 24 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.994 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1536 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 41.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5500M with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder X1900
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800S
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6650A
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M vs
AMDRadeon E8870
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M vs
NVIDIATesla P4
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile
