NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro 5500M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro 5500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1300 MHz
• 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 85 Watt
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7775 vs 6786
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 40073 vs 37186
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.821 vs 105.82
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 vs 1860.146
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.552 vs 94.947
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 684.333 vs 596.819
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 vs 9175
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 vs 9175

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M

• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 855 MHz
• Around 37% higher texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1024
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 9.6x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 476
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.238 vs 10.833
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3670 vs 2476
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2238
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3670 vs 2476
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2238

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7775 6786
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 659
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	40073 37186
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	157.821 105.82
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1934.012 1860.146
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.833 11.238
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	136.552 94.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	684.333 596.819
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 9175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3670
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 9175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3670
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3353

Compare specifications (specs)