AMD Radeon Pro 560X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1004 MHz vs 863 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 48.494 vs 30.133
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 247.728 vs 148.747
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3331
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3331
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 vs 10 September 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1004 MHz vs 863 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 48.494 vs 30.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 vs 148.747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3331 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5080 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1441.971 vs 679.583
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.36 vs 3.96
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.264 vs 62.405
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9209 vs 5367
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3582 vs 2495
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9209 vs 5367
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3582 vs 2495
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1024 |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5080 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1441.971 vs 679.583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.36 vs 3.96 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.264 vs 62.405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9209 vs 5367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3582 vs 2495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9209 vs 5367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3582 vs 2495 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 560X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3678 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17540 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 48.494 | 30.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 679.583 | 1441.971 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.96 | 7.36 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 62.405 | 64.264 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 | 148.747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5367 | 9209 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2495 | 3582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5367 | 9209 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2495 | 3582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3331 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 560X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Polaris 21 | GK110B |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 | 10 September 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 543 | 544 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1004 MHz | 863 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 7,080 million |
Boost clock speed | 902 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 173.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s |