AMD Radeon Pro 560X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560X

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1004 MHz vs 863 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 48.494 vs 30.133
  • Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 247.728 vs 148.747
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3331
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3331
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 16 July 2018 vs 10 September 2013
Core clock speed 1004 MHz vs 863 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 48.494 vs 30.133
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 247.728 vs 148.747
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 vs 3331
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 vs 3331

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

  • 2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
  • Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5080 MHz
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1441.971 vs 679.583
  • Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.36 vs 3.96
  • Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.264 vs 62.405
  • Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9209 vs 5367
  • Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3582 vs 2495
  • Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9209 vs 5367
  • Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3582 vs 2495
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2304 vs 1024
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz vs 5080 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1441.971 vs 679.583
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.36 vs 3.96
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 64.264 vs 62.405
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9209 vs 5367
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3582 vs 2495
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9209 vs 5367
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3582 vs 2495

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
48.494
30.133
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
679.583
1441.971
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3.96
7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
62.405
64.264
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
247.728
148.747
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5367
9209
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2495
3582
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
3331
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5367
9209
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2495
3582
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
3331
Name AMD Radeon Pro 560X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
PassMark - G3D Mark 3678
PassMark - G2D Mark 711
Geekbench - OpenCL 17540
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 48.494 30.133
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 679.583 1441.971
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.96 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 62.405 64.264
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 247.728 148.747
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5367 9209
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2495 3582
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 3331
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5367 9209
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2495 3582
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 3331

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 560X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Kepler
Code name Polaris 21 GK110B
Launch date 16 July 2018 10 September 2013
Place in performance rating 543 544
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $649

Technical info

Core clock speed 1004 MHz 863 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1024 2304
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 3,000 million 7,080 million
Boost clock speed 902 MHz
Floating-point performance 4,156 gflops
Texture fill rate 173.2 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Memory bus width 128 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 5080 MHz 6008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 288.4 GB / s