AMD Radeon Pro 560X vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560X and NVIDIA Quadro K2200M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560X

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1004 MHz vs 667 MHz
  • Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 5012 MHz
  • Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3678 vs 3469
  • Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 711 vs 384
  • Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17540 vs 10787
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5367 vs 4750
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3084
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5367 vs 4750
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3084
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 16 July 2018 vs 19 July 2014
Core clock speed 1004 MHz vs 667 MHz
Pipelines 1024 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed 5080 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3678 vs 3469
PassMark - G2D Mark 711 vs 384
Geekbench - OpenCL 17540 vs 10787
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5367 vs 4750
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 vs 3084
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5367 vs 4750
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 vs 3084

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

  • Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 2495
  • Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 2495
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3720 vs 2495
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3720 vs 2495

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3678
3469
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
711
384
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
17540
10787
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5367
4750
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2495
3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
3084
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5367
4750
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2495
3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
3084
Name AMD Radeon Pro 560X NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
PassMark - G3D Mark 3678 3469
PassMark - G2D Mark 711 384
Geekbench - OpenCL 17540 10787
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 48.494
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 679.583
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.96
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 62.405
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 247.728
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5367 4750
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2495 3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 3084
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5367 4750
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2495 3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 3084

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 560X NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Maxwell
Code name Polaris 21 GM107
Launch date 16 July 2018 19 July 2014
Place in performance rating 543 540
Type Mobile workstation Workstation

Technical info

Core clock speed 1004 MHz 667 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1024 640
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 65 Watt
Transistor count 3,000 million 1,870 million
Floating-point performance 853.8 gflops
Texture fill rate 26.68 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors None None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5080 MHz 5012 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 80 GB / s

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus