AMD Radeon Pro 560X vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560X and NVIDIA Quadro K2200M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1004 MHz vs 667 MHz
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3678 vs 3481
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 711 vs 374
- Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17541 vs 10787
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5367 vs 4750
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3084
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5367 vs 4750
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3084
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 vs 19 July 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1004 MHz vs 667 MHz |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 640 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3678 vs 3481 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 vs 374 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17541 vs 10787 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5367 vs 4750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3084 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5367 vs 4750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3084 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 2495
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 2495
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 2495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 2495 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 560X | NVIDIA Quadro K2200M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3678 | 3481 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 | 374 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17541 | 10787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 48.494 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 679.583 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.96 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 62.405 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5367 | 4750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2495 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3084 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5367 | 4750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2495 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3084 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 560X | NVIDIA Quadro K2200M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Polaris 21 | GM107 |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 | 19 July 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 546 | 547 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1004 MHz | 667 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,870 million |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |