AMD Radeon Pro 560X versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 560X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 560X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1004 MHz versus 863 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 48.494 versus 30.133
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 247.728 versus 148.747
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 versus 3331
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 versus 3331
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 16 July 2018 versus 10 September 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1004 MHz versus 863 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 48.494 versus 30.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 versus 148.747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3331 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 1024
- Environ 18% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 5080 MHz
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1441.971 versus 679.583
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.36 versus 3.96
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.264 versus 62.405
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9209 versus 5367
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3582 versus 2495
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9209 versus 5367
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3582 versus 2495
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 1024 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 5080 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1441.971 versus 679.583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.36 versus 3.96 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.264 versus 62.405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9209 versus 5367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3582 versus 2495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9209 versus 5367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3582 versus 2495 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 560X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3678 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17540 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 48.494 | 30.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 679.583 | 1441.971 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.96 | 7.36 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 62.405 | 64.264 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 | 148.747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5367 | 9209 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2495 | 3582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5367 | 9209 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2495 | 3582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3331 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro 560X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Polaris 21 | GK110B |
Date de sortie | 16 July 2018 | 10 September 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 543 | 544 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $649 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1004 MHz | 863 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 7,080 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 902 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 4,156 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 173.2 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
RAM maximale | 3 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.4 GB / s |