AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 945 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64325 vs 63761
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18549 vs 14496
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18549 vs 14496
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 27 May 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 945 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64325 vs 63761 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 vs 14496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 vs 14496 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 194.4 GTexel/s
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 194.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64325 | 63761 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 | 14496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 | 14496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3361 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 513 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11130 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 10 | N19E-Q1 |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 238 | 241 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1380 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 945 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 388.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 198.7 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.44 TFLOPS (2:1) | 12.72 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.221 TFLOPS | 6.359 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | 88.32 GPixel/s |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture fill rate | 194.4 GTexel/s | 198.7 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 10800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
| Laptop size | Large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5700 with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000 24 GB
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
