AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 988 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- 908.8x more texture fill rate: 194.4 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52740 vs 39432
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18549 vs 13738
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18549 vs 13738
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 21 March 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 988 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 194.4 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52740 vs 39432 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 vs 13738 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 vs 13738 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52740 | 39432 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 | 13738 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 | 13738 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11777 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.14 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2593.621 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.895 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.003 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 768.171 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Navi 10 | GM200 |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 21 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 250 | 248 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,199.99 | |
| Price now | $2,825 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 4.69 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1114 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 988 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 388.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.44 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.221 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture fill rate | 194.4 GTexel/s | 213.9 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 8,000 million |
| Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 317.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 6612 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5700 with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850 X2
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
NVIDIATesla P100 SXM2
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5500 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
